Buy Malayalam, Kannada, Hindi, Telugu, Tamil, English, Movies Blu-Rays DVDs VCDs Audio CDs MP3s Onine

Friday, August 31, 2012

Movie Review Mugamoodi Tamil 2012

After having done four intense films, director Mysskin unmasks his seriousness to a simple subject of good triumphing over evil in this UTV production venture Mugamoodi which is touted to be Tamil’s first super hero subject. The epicenter of Mukhamoodi is the love of a young man towards Kung Fu and the master who taught him this martial art form and how he utilizes this skill to woo the girl of his choice.

Smooth narrative marks the 1st half of Mugamoodi which sets the expectation and curiosity levels for the second half. Although the theme may be old, the turf is new and Mysskin makes the viewing experience an interesting one for most parts. In fact he gives an impression that he has many exciting aces up his sleeve waiting to be spread on the table. However he lets his audience down in the second half which follows a crest and trough pattern with more of troughs than crests.

For all those Mysskin fans that wait to view his touches, Mugamoodi is replete with them. Like in the middle of an action packed chase sequence, we find a man and woman in a romantic soiree in a dark alley and the introduction shot of hero and heroine from their back side for an extended period of time to name a few. And of course the very ‘Mysskin’esque slow and lengthy shots!

The events that happen when Jiiva goes to convey his love to Pooja on her father’s wedding day in the pre-interval block is suspense filled and have been executed well. There are quite a few twists and turns in Mugamoodi. The scene where Jiiva’s father spills the beans about him in front of Pooja at the mechanic shop brings out the chuckle from the audience.

As usual Jiiva scores well and his dancing skills are really a treat to watch in the Bar Anthem number. He does his action shots also perfectly and overall it is a neat performance from him. And special mention to the stunt choreographer for designing exquisite action sequences with finesse. Pooja Hegde is the typical heroine and is just about ok.

Narain as the stylish villain hits the right notes with his sinistral looks but why does he resort to a theatrical style of dialogue delivery in the 2nd half? Nasser, Girish Karnad, Selva and other supporting cast have delivered what is needed for the film.  The characterization of the grandfathers and the hunchback needs mention as someone who helps Jiiva pursue his sincere intentions.

Vaaya Moodi Summa Iruda number is interestingly and differently choreographed but somehow misses the realistic touch that was evident in the beginning of the song. As though by some sort of compulsion, the song moves to a foreign location! This could have been avoided to give the visual spunk to the popular number.

Technically Mugamoodi is superior. K’s BGM is as rocker and his scores in the action sequences are outstanding. Cinematographer Sathya brings out Mysskin’s vision on the wide canvas with his lighting and night effect shots. Extraordinary work indeed! The attempt to show Kung Fu in its vibrant form should be lauded. Although the film has many action sequences, Mysskin has abstained from gore which qualifies the film for all ages.

There are quite a few foibles in the second half. The entire coast guard appears to be muted in front of one man Narain, but Girish Karnad et al appear to walk freely inside the enemy’s terrain. Too many characters in the second half and too many blanks to be filled by the audience themselves, the second half emerges tedious. If one expects some kind of super heroic acts from the hero, it does not happen as Jiiva delivers his acts in a costume but with super-heroic intentions.

Overall, if the pace and narration of the 1st half was maintained in the 2nd half too, Mugamoodi would have emerged grander.

Verdict: Pacy first half, slow second half but compensated by the overall performance and effort of the cast.

Rating : 4/5

Movie Review Joker Hindi 2012

Labelled as Akshay Kumar’s 100th film, Joker has released amid low key marketing and promotions. Directed by Shirish Kunder and presented by UTV Motion Pictures, this movie co-stars Sonakshi Sinha. The film looks at the fascinating concept of aliens in a light-hearted way.

Agasthya (Akshay) is a space scientist in the US who is looking to device a system that would communicate with the aliens in outer space. Just then, he is forced to return to his village named Paglapur in India, which as the name indicates, has many eccentric characters, including Agasthya’s family. Things aren’t rosy at the village and he discovers that his village has been removed from the Indian map and now he plans to somehow bring his village back in the public eye. As expected he takes the help of his pet subject, aliens, to attract national interest on his village.

What follows is buffoonery and silly antics galore, which might appeal to the kids in the audience. Being Akshay Kumar’s 100th movie, he hasn’t chosen his customary comedy masala but instead chosen to make a movie for the kids. He looks very youthful while his pair Sonakshi Sinha has a cute voice that belies her mature physique. That said Sonakshi is sparkling.

Shreyas Talpade creates a riot with his alien language (gibberish) that brings about wholesome laughter on occasions. The rest of the characters in the village are also crazy in their own ways. Minisha Lamba hardly impresses in a cameo while the American antagonist named Simon Goeback (interestingly named) is sufficient.

The movie is very bright and colourful thanks to the creative art direction and sets. It would surely attract the kids, given the flourish of colours. The movie's plot turns out to be a mish-mash of some other acclaimed movies such as Swades, Lagaan, Koi Mil Gaya and Peepli Live.

On the downside, there are far too many songs even though the film is about 105 minutes long only. G.V.Prakash’s ‘Sing Raja’ and Chitrangada Singh’s item number ‘Kafirana’ make a mark for their peppy tunes and colourful picturization.

Though the movie is harmless time-pass and isn’t a bad watch, there is nothing special too. The movie doesn’t take itself too seriously and as a result even the audience will just laugh it off after coming out of the cinema halls.

Verdict: Kids might enjoy this madcap alien entertainer - Rating : 2 / 5

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Movie Review Sriman Narayana Telugu

Journalist Sriman alias Srimannarayana (Balakrishna) fights for his father’s dreams. His father (Vijay Kumar) dreams for the welfare of farmers. He starts a fund for them and a huge sum of money collected from various donations. Bad guys eye that money and kills Sriman’s father. Sriman gets arrested as the money disappears. How does he fulfill his father’s wish is the crux of this story.

Srimannarayana is a commercial film made with noble intentions. This film shows a solution to the farmers welfare. Despite the intention, Srimannarayana fails to entertain due to lackluster screenplay and poor writing.

Movie starts off at a sluggish pace and moves ahead without proper aim and direction. Everything settles after an hour into the movie. From then on it is about the revenge drama. Hero will never be challenged by any of the cardboard villains.

Director’s weakness to establish emotional situations has been highlighted throughout. Hero is never put into a spot of bother. He just cakewalks anywhere and one gets a feeling that journalists are super human and have super powers.

Instead of wasting the first hour on unnecessary stuff, the director should have established the characters properly. Although the middle part of the movie is a bit better than the rest, it fails on a whole due to uninteresting narration. Even so called mass elements are not utilized properly. This film could have been better if the director handled it in a proper way. Treatment like Ganesh and Aazad movies might have worked here.

Balakrishna is usual. He is at his best in emotional scenes. His dances are very good. Despite the age he is flexible. Parvati Melton is okay as the journalist who falls head over heels for the hero. Isha Chawla is fine. Suresh is weak as the main villain. Rest of the villains didn’t leave any mark as their characters are not etched properly. Comedy too didn’t work as it was stale. Vijay Kumar  and Vinod Kumar are apt in their respective roles.

Cinematography is okay. Editing is poor. Music by Chakri is fine. There are a couple of foot tapping numbers. Background score is not up to the mark. Director Ravi Kumar Chavali failed to get the emotions right. Bad script didn’t allow him to excel in any department. Should have taken care for this big ticket movie.

Final Word: Srimannarayana fails to impress due to bad script. Balakrishna fans may like it.

Srimannarayana Movie Rating: 2.5/5
Banner: Yellow Flowers
Cast: Bala Krishna, Isha Chawla, Parvati Melton
Direction: Ravi Chavali
Music: Chakri
Producer: Ramesh Puppala

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Movie Review Perumaan Tamil 2012

Perumaan, directed by Rajesh Kannan, starring new comers Arjun and Sruthi has hit the screens after being in the cans for a long time. This is a suspense thriller that happens in the backdrop of Chennai.

Shakthi (Arjun), an IT professional aspires to be as famous as superstar Rajinikanth, for which he thinks he needs loads of money. An opportunity knocks his door, when his friend asks him to assist a businessman in getting the latter’s black money to India through an NGO. Shakthi does the job and becomes filthy rich. With so much money around him, he loses the peace of mind he had earlier. Fear of his money being stolen gets into his mind, unexpected traps await him and how he manages to survive is ‘Perumaan’ in a nutshell.

With too many pot holes in the script, the director fails to keep the audience engaged. Shakthi gets chased by many groups in the film, but the reason for this must be known only to the makers. The businessman asks Shakthi to maintain a low profile, so as to keep the money he earned a secret (A valid point). But it looks meaningless when he tries to kill Shakthi for eating in a road side tea shop. There are more such logical inconsistencies in the story.

Arjun looks smart, with his impeccable physique. But when it comes to acting, the hero creates an impression that he is attempting to say something. But he disappoints and with his cryptic expressions he leaves the audience pondering as to what he is trying to say.  None of the other actors, including the female lead, Sruthi have significant roles. There are one or two comic moments when Arjun’s friends are around.

CJ Rajkumar’s cinematography creates a short film like effect. It is evident that the makers have gone for a low end camera. Music director Vikram Sarathy (of the contemporary music band Staccato) has scored music for the film. Few of his OSTs are exceptional and the composer has made use of a variety of instruments. But towards the end of the film, the cinematography and the background scores together create a ‘mega serial’ impression, too noisy and too shaky. The lack of sufficient dialogues is also a major contributing factor in creating this sense.

To sum up, Perumaan could have been made as a decent short film. Fewer dialogues, jumpy song sequences and the dead slow script show the director’s desperation to make it into a two and a half hours feature film.

Verdict: Da Vinci’s codes are much easier to crack

Movie Review Aachariyangal Tamil 2012

So what happens when you accidentally wish for something to happen and, you know, God appears and grants your wish? You start believing in God? That shred of imagination seems to have caught the fancy of debut director Harshavardhan. In Aachariyangal, he weaves a very simplistic tale of families and relationships starting from the kernel as mentioned earlier. The idea might look novel on paper but translating it into a full length feature film requires a lot of seasoning-up of the script and Harsha has more or less succeeded in doing that.

Harsha is one of the few film enthusiasts (around 250 to be precise) to undergo a screen writing workshop held by Kamal’s Raaj Kamal Films with IIT Madras a few years ago. It’s unquestionable that he earned some of his writing skills at the workshop since the writing is fresh although the recurring themes of the movie are nothing new-fangled for the audience.

In a movie that has the potential to turn out to be insipid, Harsha peppers it up with incidents, albeit dramatic and tries to up its pace. It works, most of the time. And it’s commendable that he has not bowed to the pressures of adding the almost mandatory songs.

As for the story, if it isn’t evident by now; Taman and his friends, fresh pass-outs from college, celebrate their graduation and when he is drunk, Taman calls out to God beseeching him to make his life more interesting. And things happen from then on. Aachariyangal has every reason to make the transition into a thriller / horror movie but Harsha keeps it within the bounds of a lighthearted entertainer.

Taman Kumar plays the film’s lead and unlike other debut actors, he has a little more scope than just play the charming male lead of the film. Though not with flying colors, he passes with fairly above average marks when it comes to his acting skills. His bewilderment at the consequent events is captured subtly, thanks to the well written script.

Other actors, female leads Ritu Manga and Aishwarya have done their jobs neatly. So have stage actors like Shanty Williams and Amarasigamani. One gripe about the movie is that the drama gets quite overboard sometimes. Also, there is a very evident starting trouble with the movie as the first half just meanders along before the movie lands in its position with a thud.

Ganesh Ragavendra, whose earlier credits include the successful Renigunta, has rendered background score for the movie. Director Harshavardhan also handles the story, screenplay, dialogue and direction and hasn’t faltered much in any of the aspects.

But the biggest drawback with the movie is the feeling of seeing a television serial. The pace of the movie is also snail-like until it picks up towards the end. In fact the movie lives up to its title thanks to its final moments. The ending touch is also apt.

To conclude, Aachariyangal might not make your day but it has its trump cards lined-up just when you feel like brushing it away.

Verdict: Inspite of its meager production values, this one picks up steam towards the end and lives up to its title - Rating : 2/5

Review Shirin Farhad Ki Toh Nikal Padi

All love stories generally have a template – 2 strangers meet and fall for each other and then brief conflicts arise between the two before the final matchup. Shirin Farhad Ki Toh Nikalpadi also has the same components except that here we have two 40 plus adults falling in love. The setting is also different - all the characters belong to the Parsi community.

Farhad Pastakia is a 45 year old working as a salesman in a women’s lingerie shop who isn’t happening in the matrimonial market due to his profession, while Shirin Fugawala is still single as she has an ailing father to take care of. The conflict element in their ‘love at first sight’ is provided by Farhad’s mom who just can’t forgive Shirin for a mere petty issue. How the two of them finally manage to unite in matrimony is the resolution to this flick.

The film manages to turn out to be an endearing rom-com thanks to the terrific acting by Boman Irani and Farah Khan as the middle aged lovers. Boman excels in comedy as well as the serious scenes towards the end and his body language in particular is typical of a middle-aged man. Farah’s voice is her greatest plus and she even shows off her excellent dancing skills in few of the songs. The other characters in the large Parsi community also make a mark like the old man who is caught in a time warp and is still mad about Indira Gandhi. Farhad’s mother and grandmother also have a sizable part so does Shirin’s aunt.

The movie has been executed in a meager budget and money hasn’t been splurged on huge sets, extra-ordinary cinematography, sizzling costumes and exotic locations. It is just a movie about an average couple and their desire to find true love.

Jeet Ganguly’s songs are good to listen to, but this movie would have been better off, without songs. Few of the songs definitely drag the movie. Therefore even with a running time of 112 minutes, the movie isn’t taut.

Sanjay Leela Bhansali has written this movie and the comedy portions standout. Some funny scenes are built around Farhad’s profession. The first encounter between Shirin and Farhad’s mom is another brilliant funny sequence. The romance is also likable with several cutesy moments. Bela Bhansali Sehgal has directed this movie and she has presented this movie in an engaging manner with just a few glitches.

To conclude, this movie would give hope to those youngsters who are still searching for their love. Love has no expiry date, that’s what they would learn.

Verdict: This “better late than never” romance is worth a watch for its simplicity and heartening moments.

Movie Review 18 Vayasu Tamil 2012

We have had many movies in Tamil where the lead protagonist has some mental ailment. Starting from Sigappu Rojakkal down to some of Dhanush’s recent movies, there have been good films that have taken some psychiatric disorder and explored the same. Now we have 18 Vayasu, yet another movie talking about a mentally challenged youngster.

Here Karthik (Johnny) is a young man who has a unique disorder wherein he starts imbibing an animal’s characteristics whenever he notices one, under stress. A haunting incident during his childhood and physical abuse from his negligent mother are the reasons for this unique behavior.

He encounters Gayathri (Gayathri) and she is like a breath of fresh air in Karthik’s life. Mutual liking slowly blossoms between the two until Karthik’s disorder catches up with him and now he is forced to run for cover from the police. We also have a team of doctors who are ready to help him.

Another eccentric elder man named Jackie (Sathyendra) also joins him on the run while Gayathri is also inevitably lured into this chase. What happens to Karthik, whether Gayathri understands him and whether he is cured? Watch 18 Vayasu to find out.

Director Panneerselvam hasn’t resorted to violence, gore or skin show despite the scope for including such elements. The scenes when Johnny imbibes those animal instincts must have been a tightrope walk for the director and he has come out clean. The bull fight towards the end is a rocker.

Johnny is suited for such unconventional roles. In the entire movie he doesn’t remove his head-gear even once. The scenes in the first half when he slowly develops feelings for Gayathri are really well done by the young actor. The scenes with the old neighbor also make an impact. He has imbibed the characteristics of a dog, cat, bat, snake, bull and even a small insect. Must have been quite an effort!

Gayathri is a good find and she looks cute and emotes well too. Among the other characters, the desperate girl who tries to woo Karthik in the start is an irritant.

Rohini is wasted as the doctor who is ever-willing to help Karthik. Sathyendra as Jackie is a revelation though he goes overboard at times in his eccentric act. His constant dialog ‘Kaadhal Vaazhga’ is a pain at times. His funny encounters with the police are enjoyable.

Cinematographer Shakthi has done a decent job particularly in those animal instinct scenes.

The BGM score is a plus. The songs by Charles Bosco and Dinesh Kanagaratnam are average and wrongly placed. As a result, though the songs have been shot and choreographed well, monotony sets in.

Another minus in the movie is its length and the absence of detailing about Karthik’s disorder. The audience might also lose interest as tedium might set in, given the presence of eccentric characters who repeat their characteristics often.

On the whole, though a worthy attempt, this movie might not be everyone’s cup of tea. The director has taken his own sweet time to complete the movie. This might result in restlessness among the audience. If you are willing to forgive such speed glitches and some streaks of boredom, 18 Vayasu might appeal to you.

Verdict: Worthy attempt, but the subject and the slow narration will test patience - Rating : 3/5

Movie Review Run Baby Run Malayalam 2012 Mohanlal Amala Paul Movie Hit

Director Joshiy and Superstar Mohanlal, who together created the superhit film “Christian Brothers”, are back in action with another scintillating film, this time with another fancy name “Run Babby Run”. Joining the party is Amala Paul, whose first Malayalam film was “Aakashathinte Niram”. Milan Jaleel produces under the banner of Galaxy Films.

What happens when two journalists, at loggerheads with each other, are forced to work together on a matter of utmost secrecy? Mohanlal as Venu and Amala Paul as Renuka have to do exactly that in “Run Baby Run’ and that too with straight faces.

Venu and Renuka work in the media field, Venu as a photographer and Renuka as an executive director. But that doesn’t make them close; on the contrary, they hated the sight of each other. So imagine a situation where they were put together for an assignment!
Venu is a channel photographer while Renuka is the executive director of Bharath Vision. Later, Venu shifts to Delhi as the chief photographer of Reuters and concentrates on exclusive coverage of sensitive and important events. After 5 years in Delhi, he is asked to go to Kerala to do a cover story on a highly confidential affair and to his utter surprise, Renuka is sent as his partner. They kept themselves apart because of their king-size ego and now they find themselves forced to work together on an assignment of highly secretive nature. Would they be able to go ahead? Whats their actual intentions? Or will their egos work against them? What is in a woman’s mind when forced to work with a person she dislikes intimately? All these and more are illustrated in ‘Run Baby Run’.

The script by Sachy is weak and the screenplay could have been better but Joshi has overcome the negatives with his expertise in dealing with time tested formulae and he has managed to bring out a reasonably entertaining film. As is usual in most films, the second half is not as entertaining as the first, but still the scenes are compelling enough to keep the fans riveted. At times, the scenes remind you of Hindi and Tamil movies and the viewer has the choice to decide whether it is a complement or not.

In spite of all the faults, “Run Babby Run” manages to run and reach home mainly because of the overwhelming presence of Mohanlal who comes out with another mesmerizing performance. Amala Paul dazzles all too briefly while Biju Menon, though looking crisp and smart, is striking. Sai Kumar, Vijayaraghavan, Siddique, Midhun Ramesh and Saadiq carry out their roles adequately and usual.

As stated earlier, Sachy’s script goes off the track far too often to be called really good. However, cinematographer R D Rajasekhar had done a tremendous job and so too the art direction team of Joseph Nellikkal and Sabu Pravadas. Costume by Palani is quite eye-catching and editing by Syam has been sufficient. Music by Ratheesh Vega (Aattumanal...) is catchy and suits the mood but the BGM do not linger to the flick.
The ending is quite like the usual thriller with no surprises and could collect a bit of whistling and booing. All in all however, “Run Babby Run’ is entertaining and watchable as long as you keep your expectations low. And of course for the sake of watching Mohanlal who has been fantastic. If only the makers had put in a bit more passion, things could have been much better.

Superhit Don't Miss its a wonderful movie rating : 4/5

Friday, August 24, 2012

Movie Review The Apparition English


The Apparition is your typical, ultimately forgettable horror film that serves up more unintentional laughs than scares. Tom Felton of the Harry Potter series appears as Patrick, a sort of paranormal-obsessed Encyclopedia Brown, whose jerry-rigged college experiment ends with one of the participants being sucked up into -- somewhere, the wall? The maw of the Apparition? Who knows. She's gone, and the apparition is on the loose.

Fast forward a few years, and Patrick's paranormal accomplice Ben (Sebastian Stan, of Captain America and Gone) is attempting to make a life for himself with his girlfriend Kelly (Ashley Greene). They've just moved into a house in a mostly empty land development in Palmdale, CA, where their only neighbors seem to be a guy and his daughter and their dog. Kelly's parents bought the house as an investment, like the Bluths from Arrested Development, minus any personality and plus a ghost.

Immediately, something otherwordly begins screwing with their absolutely normal, Costco-going, everyday lives. Things move, doors open, nasty-looking "mold" begins growing on things, and once Kelly discovers Ben's ghost-hunting past (and the fact that the girl who disappeared was his ex, sob!), their relationship begins unraveling as the ghost ramps up its reign of terror. This gives Patrick the chance to re-enter his friend's life so they can bust out their ghost-hunting (and ideally ghost-trapping) gear and get to work.

Sometimes, a movie gives you the feeling that something's been left on the cutting room floor. Somewhere along the line, scenes were snipped or added, toned down or ramped up, and what you're left with is a messy, confusing final product. One might be generous and think this is the case with The Apparition. Was there supposed to be more of a commentary on suburban life? If not, why does Costco keep popping up? Did someone with greater clout persuade the writer or director to inject an appearance of the ghost that's so ludicrous it made me think someone had swapped out a reel from Scary Movie? Was it supposed to be purposefully funny in places, and someone higher up demanded they tone it down?

It's not really our job as viewers to try and figure out what went wrong, only that it did go wrong. The Apparition is a DVD rental at best, unless you enjoy paying money to tell characters onscreen how dumb they are. The best thing one can say about The Apparition is at least it's not another "found footage" movie. That's not saying much.

Movie Review Paandioli Peruku Nilayam


Rasu Madhuravan, who made last year's incestuous Muthukku Muthaaga, returns with yet another tearjerker called Pandi Oli Perukki Nilayam. He tries his hand at comedy in the first half. It is juvenile humour, in excess, attesting to Rasu Madhuravan's belief that the average Tamilian skips puberty. It's very silly albeit watchable.

About halfway through this farce the comedy steps aside, giving way to its dramatic half to take over. The intermission has Madhuravan beg you from walking out. "Wait and See," is printed on screen. Not long after the film resumes, we see the heroine pluck a strand of hair from the hero's head, mix it with water and gulp it down. What does that signify? That she's a fetishist? Sheesh, this is a real snooze. And the music number infestation gives you a damn' headache. Your only option is to sit there pained.

Pandi Oli Perukki Nilayam might not be consistently bathed in sentimentality but the melodrama makes up for its late arrival by being one-hundred-percent trite. The hero is killing the villain (set to a looped track from Apocalypto) and is garlanded by four men whom he once wished were his brothers-in-law. Their garlanding is an act of gratitude for avenging on behalf of their dead sister. ROFL. Madhuravan is fine with being redundant and very comfortable with leaving sentimentality in its crudest state. He also loves pulling your strings as if you were an inanimate object and he, the puppeteer.

I walked out of the theatre feeling the tunes of the corny closing song resonate in my ears, questioning the validity of what I feel- a condescending attack on my intelligence and a successful way to reduce me to an idiot. This is just the kind of wretchedness that I felt last year, after watching Muthukku Muthaaga.

Rating : 1/5

Movie Review Edho Seidhai Ennai Tamil

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Movie Review Delhi In A Day Hindi 2012


There have been far too many cross over films in the recent few years that have made it to Hindi screens. While some have blended the cultures of both east and west really well, some have tried to show India from the eyes of a foreigner. The latter seems to be the case with yet another cross over film Delhi In A Day.

A PVR Director's Rare, Delhi In A Day showcases the divide between the upper class society and the poverty stricken domestic helps that too through the eyes of a foreigner from London. Jasper (Lee Williams) wants to see the real India and hence starts off his trip by visiting his father's partner in Delhi, Mukund Bhatia (Kulbhushan Kharbanda). In a palatial house in Delhi filled with numerous domestic aides, Jasper in his very first day loses all his savings that he carried with him. Mukund's better half Kalpana (Lilette Dubey) starts suspecting every domestic help and gives them 24 hours to own up their fault. Whether it turns out to be one amongst them or not follows through the rest of the plot.

NRI director Prashant Nair deploys some of the formulaic tricks of making a crossover cinema, right from the conversational sequence between a local cabbie and a foreigner which has been done to death before to the foreigner wanting to travel through the trains and buses in a big to see "real India", a commonly used dialogue.

The biggest flaw in the film is that there's nothing Delhi specific about it. The film could well be based in Mumbai or any other city as filmmaker Prashant Nair doesn't quite explore any Delhi essence except for showing a Punjabi family which could be situated anywhere.

Delhi In A Day does start on an interesting and pleasant note interspersed with great humour brought about by the mannerisms of Kulbhushan Kharbanda and Lilette Dubey. Even the initial portions of Jasper are intriguing. However, right from the time the main plot of missing money takes off, the film just treads on a wafer-thin plot testing the viewers patience. There's ample time spent on unrequired portions like the long dance sequence of Rohini (Anjali Patil) on an old song.

Moreover, many a things are left unexplained like what happens after Rohini goes into a notorious bylane of Delhi in a bid to take a loan. Or even the behavior Chotu (Arun Mallick) towards Rohini. Or Jasper's fascination with Rohini.

The film however, had ample scope to make for an enjoyable movie. However, it gets reduced to just being enjoyable in terms of characterization and humour. Kulbhushan Kharbanda is at his typified best and is surely a delight to watch. Most of the humour in the film centers around him. Lilette Dubey as the upper class hoity-toity housewife makes for a perfect cast too. Lee Williams is average at best. However, what takes the cake is the casting of the house-help. Right from Chotu to Rohini or even Raghu (Vidya Bhushan) all put together an outstanding show. They fit the bill to the T and full marks to Prashant Nair for having cast them.

To sum it up, Delhi In A Day could have been a fine attempt however, with a wafer thin plot and a very slow pace it turns into a dull affair.

Rating : 2.5/5

Movie Review Premium Rush English


Writer/director David Koepp's previous efforts as a screenwriter have helped define modern blockbuster movies. Jurassic Park, Mission: Impossible, Spider-Man — films that put the "big" in big screen. As a director, he's taken the same sensibilities and applied them to narrower fields of vision, with intimate spins on horror and comedy in movies like Secret Window and Ghost Town. His latest, Premium Rush, fits the same bill; an immersive chase thriller set in the off-beat world of biker culture, the movie has its simple goals and executes them with a wink-wink attitude. It's a summer action movie through and through, but with sensibilities that make it fresh and quirky. In the doldrums of August, it's exactly the rush one needs.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt stars as Wilee, a law-student-turned-bike-messenger who lives for the thrills of a speedy ride. During one run-of-the-mill pick-up at Columbia University, Wilee finds himself in the crosshairs of corrupt cop Bobby Monday (Michael Shannon). Inside the envelope Wilee's been hired to delver to Chinatown is something Detective Monday needs, and he's willing to do anything to get it. No skin off Wilee's nose — he has an address and a delivery time, and like a good messenger, he's equally driven to make the drop.

Premium Rush quickly kicks off its extended action set piece and never lets up, Koepp only occasionally stepping back in time to unravel backstory and up the stakes. Wilee's girlfriend Vanessa (Dania Ramirez), also a bike messenger, is the roommate of Nima (Jamie Chung), a Chinese student who is shipping the sealed MacGuffin downtown. For her, it's life or death, and Koepp wisely underplays the motivations ,both to downplay its over-the-top nature and keep the stunts in focus. Monday has his own issues to contend with, and it gives Shannon the perfect material to chew up. Before chasing Wilee, Monday suffers from a gambling and violence problem, and while it drives the character to pursue the package, it's really just a great excuse for Shannon to go absolutely bonkers. Somewhere beyond Nic Cage and Al Pacino exists Shannon's turn and it's a hoot.

Gordon-Levitt balances him out as an engaging presence, even while zipping through gridlocks and shifting his eyes for "Bike-O-Vision" (Wilee's accident-avoiding, stylized Spidey sense). He spends most of his time interchanged with professional bike riders who make the two-wheeled maneuvers work, but it's seamless. After an hour and a half of bikes pop-a-wheeling over taxis, skidding under semi-trailer trucks, and pulling off cycle parkour in a multileveled NYPD impound, the action tends to get a bit repetitive — how much can you do on a bike? — but Koepp's kinetic directing keeps the movie zippy and the tone loose. Wilee's entire adventure feels like one big trick. Thankfully, it avoids the crash and burn.


Release Date: 08/24/2012
Rating: 4/5
Runtime: Not Yet Available
Genre: Drama
Director: David Koepp
Cast: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Michael Shannon, Dania Ramirez, Jamie Chung

Movie Review Sudigadu Telugu 2012


Shiva (Allari Naresh) is separated from his parents in his clildhood due to villain Tikkal Reddy (Jayaprakash Reddy). Shiva is a gifted person who has many super powers like a Telugu film mass hero. He falls in love with Priya (Monal Gajjar) and takes up a challenge after challenge and how he comes out victorious is what the film is about.

Sudigadu is the first ever full time spoof made in Telugu cinema. Hollywood regularly makes such spoofs and Tamil filmmakers tried it with Tamizh Padam, which was a super hit there. Bheemaneni Srinivasa Rao thought of remaking it by spoofing popular Telugu cinema scenes and that is how Sudigadu happened.

Making a film by adding so many scenes from other hit movies is not as easy as it appears. A spoof here and there will work, but making a full fledged film using this technique is risky. Luckily Bheemaneni had a source to bank upon. All he needed to do was to stitch up all the hilarious scenes into one film.

There are certain scenes which have come out hilariously well and there are few didn’t work at all. That is ought to happen when you keep on making one spoof after another. This is something new to our audiences. In spite of the entertainment, they might feel that it is missing a proper story.

Sudigadu will be thoroughly entertaining for people who really know the meaning of a ‘spoof’. Audiences who don’t know such genre exists might find it a bit amusing. Despite few shortcomings Sudigadu has super fun moments and it will provide the humor that is worth your ticket price.

Allari Naresh is at his energetic best in this film. We can see that he is enjoying doing this role. When an actor enjoys his job, the result would be excellent. Monal Gajjar looks okay, but is a pretty bad actress. Brahmanandam shines and Posani Krishna Murali is a surprise package. Everyone did their part so well. Director should have used few talents in a better way.

Cinematography was okay for a comedy film. There was nothing much to rave about. Music was unimpressive. They tried to be experimental, but that can’t be an excuse for those bad tunes. Editing is fine. Dialogues are hilarious.

Bheemaneni Srinivasa Rao is a specialist in doing remakes. He has made many hit remakes in the past and this time he took up the tough job of making a full fledged comedy, which was not his forte. However, he did a fine job with the script.

Sudigadu is an entertaining film which will please the audiences that can appreciate a complete spoof. Others may find it a bit amusing. Sudigadu opened to packed housed all over and it is sure to hit the bull’s eye on the business front.

Sudigadu Movie Rating: 3/5

Banner: Arundhati Movies
Cast: Allari Naresh, Monal Gajjar, Brahmanandam
Direction: Bheemineni Srinivasa Rao
Music: Sree Vasanth
Producer: Chandra Shekhar D Reddy

Movie Review Shiva 2012 Kannada


‘Shiva’ is a revenge saga. For the killing of parents – hero Shiva (Shivarajakumar) and heroine Julie (Ragini) makes a combined effort in evaporating the trio – Ravishanker, Rangayana Raghu and Gurudut.

Shiva is the son of honest Jockey – played by Ravi Kaale, while Julie is the daughter of an honest journalist played by Suchindra Prasad.

Julie is under the impression after 15 years that Shiva is the son of Adhikeshavalu (Rangayan Raghu) one of the three tormentors. So she takes revenge in the grave yard against Shiva in the pretext of love. Later she realizes the mistake she has done. They have common enemies of trio gang that is very dangerous and possess international links.

Julie and Shiva jointly trace the hidden secrets in a computer and they escape miraculously on a motorbike. Later Julie is kidnapped in a helicopter in return of documents. Shiva arrives on the scenes and hundreds of heads roll in front of Lord Shiva idol.

That is the end of the good versus evil in ‘Shiva.

It is exhilarating in exhibiting developments in the first half. The second half becomes monotonous. The issue based in the first half is the new look of the director – the honest and educated youngsters getting the job of cops, children business via begging are although unconnected to the cinema, it heightens the image of the protagonist.

In the first half Shiva going behind Julie and pressurizing for love is not heard in the previous films of Shivarajakumar.

When Shiva is told that he is not the son of Adhikeshavulu, he gets the full support for his operation from a prison that too from one of the three that Shiva is looking for – this is not justified. He gets the support of one of the trio but even that person (played by Gurudut) joins the dreaded two Ravishanker and Rangayana Raghu.

In the speed, production values, dialogues, action, music, acting the film is much stronger. These are the elements worth bringing audience to the theatres.

The screenplay of director N Om Prakash Rao is not different indeed. He has picked a few scenes from various films. For the regular reviewer this could be easily traced.

For example the protagonist coming in truck loads of injured and pouring in front of the villain to show his power is seen in many films.

In the commercial cinema the hero escaping from hundreds of pistol attackers is something very difficult to digest. The three pierces to the stomach of the hero from a very sharp weapon by heroine Julie and hero escaping from death is something very common on silver screen.

The making is good and enacting is powerful. ‘Shiva’ is just a treat for the fans of Shivarajakumar in the ‘damal-damil’ style of N Omprakash Rao.

Full marks to Shivarajakumar for fulfilling tough responsibility. In action, dance, dialogue delivery, funny scenes he is too good. No one can say that he is 50 in age. He looks like 25. When Shivarajakumar says in one of the dialogues that he wants to be in one of the pages of history – it makes a good sense.

The film has some special dialogues for Shivarajakumar that connect to the Kannada cinema industry colleagues and the family of Dr Rajakumar.

Ragini is brilliant as heroine. She has done a character that has not come to her so far. She looks beautiful, danced well and proved that she is a better actress. In a few of the costumes Ragini looks very glamorous.

Among the tormentors – Ravishanker with powerful dialogues and high BP style of dialogues is usual; Ranganaya Raghu delivering Telugu dialogues making it comedy in his performance has not much of challenge. Gurudut is fit for the role in the second half.

Ravi Kaale is a soft guy in this film; Suchindra Prasad is cool in his short presence. The laugh riot comes from Shobaraj and Bullet Prakash as Malavalli brothers.

The stunts handled by three action directors – Ravi Verma, Palani Raj and Different Danny are wonderful. In fact this is the treat for the fans of Shivarajakumar. The sword fight, chase and rolling shots are mind blowing.

The editing of this film could have been better as the songs appear without giving any clue at one place. The connectivity is missing.

Sathya Hegde top angle shots are very absorbing. Holding the action portions is also a difficult task for any cameraman. Sathya Hegde covering the huge areas in the camera at several places shows his ability and strength.

Gurukiran is back with a few good melodies – Shille Hodi Shille Hodi….Oosaravalli…..Nee Odi Bandaga….Kollegaladalli….are good and racy. They are well shot with good production values.

The graphic work here and there for the film adds extra power and it is attractive from the fans point of view.

FABULOUS I HALF USUAL SECOND HALF – Score -3/5
Cast – Shivarajakumar, Ragini, Ravishanker, Shobaraj, Bullet Prakash, Rangayana Raghu, Gurudut, Suchindra Prasad, Suchitra, John Kokkin, Chitra Shenoy, Ravi Kaale and others.
Cinematography – Sathya Hegde
Producers – Shrikanth and Kantharaj
Music – Gurukiran
Direction – N Om Prakash Rao  

Movie Review Thappana Malayalam


Johny Antony's 'Thaappaana' is more of an assemblage of parts and pieces that we have seen in other movies. The film mashes them together and neatly lays out the assortment before us, which appears quite messy.

Samson (Mammootty), out from jail after serving a sentence of four years, is excited to see a beautiful Mallika (Charmi Kaur) emerging out of the women's jail. Possibilities of a romance spurt in Samson's mind, and he accompanies her to her village, where surprises await him.

Sindhuraj's script plays total spoil sport here, and drags quite a while in the initial hour. Samson is besotted by Mallika, and even sings a song out in the streets, gaping at her photograph all the while. And in true Kollywood style, the passers by join in and shake legs with him.


The film is more of a road movie till about half way through, at least until Samson and Mallika reach Karippa. They meet one of Samson's old jail mates (Vijeesh) on the way, and off they go on a detour for a while. The efforts are on to prove that true love emerges a winner.

At Karippa, post-interval Samson assumes heroic proportions and gets ready for a head-to-head meeting with Kannu Kuttan. Things progress in a manner as predictable as they can be, before the dust bows up for a deafening climax. Thugs and goons get thrown this way and that before everything settles down, and the credits are cleared.

The man with massive powers arriving at an alien village and bringing about a change through his fists and fisticuffs is no new story in Malayalam. It has all been said a thousand times already, and there is hardly anything new about the presentation either!

I am totally clueless as to what made Mammootty accept 'Thaappaana'. Its not that he does injustice to the character as such, but it's the facileness of the role that he plays that is absolutely surprising. There are any number of films in which we have seen him essay similar roles, and 'Thaappaana' is sadly no exception.

When I think of those best moments in the film, one figure does tower over the rest, which is Muraly Gopi's. He seems to be getting better with each film, and as the ruthless ruffian in 'Thaappaana', he is dynamite. His steely stare, grimace and scowls make him one of the best villains of the year, no doubt.

The problem isn't that the characters or the story in 'Thaappaana' are way too simple. The real issue lies in the fact that these characters never really become three dimensional that would make you want to reach out to them. There is plenty of stuff going on, no doubt, but none that would make you feel that a royal elephant is on the rampage out there!

Rating : 3/5 - Hit

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Movie Review Cosmopolis 2012


The director David Cronenberg has climbed back into an automobile. In “Crash,” his collision saturnalia of 1996, adapted from a morbidly sexual novel by J. G. Ballard, Cronenberg staged violent and erotic happenings in a kind of vehicular theatre of the imagination. He has now adapted the work of an even more talented apocalyptic fantasist, Don DeLillo, whose novel “Cosmopolis” (2003) has furnished him with a superbly written text set mostly in a stretch limo. Cronenberg has made an eccentric and beautiful-looking movie—a languid, deadpan, conceptualist joke. The hero is one of those young capitalist predators who have been haunting American fiction (in, say, “The Bonfire of the Vanities” and “American Psycho”). His name is Eric Michael Packer, and he’s played by the hesitant, long-jawed Robert Pattinson, the gallant and fastidious vampire of the “Twilight” series. Eric is a twenty-eight-year-old asset manager whose life is at once completely protected and utterly vulnerable. He steps into his limo in the morning in a Gucci suit and dark glasses, and announces his intention to cross Manhattan for a haircut. But his progress through the city is impeded by the traffic-snarling appearance of the President.

In “Crash,” speed and recklessness behind the wheel kept the movie going, but this time life in a car has literally slowed to a crawl. Various people visit Eric, including two twerpy geniuses, barely shaving, who stare at handheld devices and give investment counsel; an old lover (Juliette Binoche), who has sex with him among the black leather couchettes while offering to find a Rothko for his collection (Eric wants the Rothko Chapel—the entire chapel); and a doctor who gives him his daily prostate exam. Outside the limousine, the tawdry and electric city slowly passes, as if in a moving diorama. Eventually, the car is engulfed by a ferocious and madcap anti-capitalist rally. Vague threats materialize—someone unknown may be trying to kill Eric. All the while, he is watching millions of dollars vanish: he has placed an enormous, heavily leveraged bet on the fall of the yuan, which, stubbornly, improbably, continues to rise.

An erudite but vacant young man, Eric lives mainly within the pulsing circuits of electronic information. We can feel DeLillo’s loathing for the dematerialized world of financial manipulation; he makes Eric a kind of science-fiction metaphor of a human being, and Cronenberg cast the right man for a living cyborg. Pattinson has large eyes, heavy eyebrows, a soft voice. He’s sombre and quiet, a minimalist actor, but he has just enough tension to keep us interested in this intelligent creep. For Eric, the past doesn’t exist, the present is simply money zipping around the globe, the future is his to inhabit. Inside his car, he lives at a still point, but the market economy creates hysterical activity all around him. Though DeLillo wrote the novel a few years after the tech collapse of 2000, it now seems prescient about the much greater collapse of 2008. “We’re speculating in a void,” as one of the twerps says, but that remark no longer sounds extravagant—not after billions of dollars bet on derivatives and “synthetic credit products” have disappeared into the air. And the book’s anti-capitalist theatrics in the streets seem a very accurate anticipation of the Occupy Wall Street movement. DeLillo even understood the ambivalence of the protest: did these people hate capitalism or were they afraid that they had been left behind by it?

Cronenberg has retained much of DeLillo’s dialogue, which is, by turns, clipped and expansive and idea-studded—a kind of postmodernist exposition of how money functions in cyberspace. And he has come up with an equivalent to DeLillo’s curt and cool equipoise—a style of filmmaking that is classically measured and calm, without an extra shot or cut. The interior of the car is designed in shades of black and dark gray, with chrome trim and blue, glowing screens. Despite the constrictions, Cronenberg keeps the space handsome and active. For long stretches, “Cosmopolis” is dreamy and funny, in an off-centered way. At one point, the limo pulls alongside a taxi, and Eric steps into the cab and sits next to a pretty young woman (Sarah Gadon), who turns out to be his wife of twenty-two days. They have a polite conversation; they agree to meet for sex. But as the violence outside grows more frantic, and the money disappears, the tone of the movie darkens. Eric uncoils, slowly losing his will to dominate. He becomes masochistic and virtually indifferent to everything but the most extreme body sensations. When John Updike reviewed the novel in these pages, he asked why we should care about the possible death of this arrogant cipher. A good question, but I’m not sure that emotional involvement is the goal of either the novel or the movie. A certain ghastly possibility—a glimpse of a stone-dead future temperament—has been made potent for us. But it doesn’t go unchallenged. At the end, Eric meets the world he has left behind, in the person of a former employee, the dishevelled, rasping Paul Giamatti. The future may have overtaken the present, but the clay beneath Eric’s feet is still capable of active revolt.

When “Compliance” was shown at the Sundance Festival, last January, some people in the audience got so upset that they started shouting during the screening; others simply walked out. Watching “Compliance” recently, I also began to squirm and talk back, but not because I disliked the movie, which I think is brilliant. American movies are saturated in physical violence; this one is devoted to spiritual violence. “Compliance,” an independent film written and directed by Craig Zobel, is about something serious—our all too human habit of obedience when we are faced with authority. The movie is driven by an urgent moral inquiry, yet it has the mesmerizing detail and humor of a very idiosyncratic fiction. Zobel’s setting is a fast-service chicken franchise in Ohio. The sixtyish Sandra (Ann Dowd), the manager, has a lot on her hands—a heavy Friday-night crowd, not enough bacon in the larder, and a few young employees who slack off when they can. The phone rings: a man identifying himself as a police officer (Pat Healy) says that one of the girls working the front counter, Becky (Dreama Walker), a pretty teen-age blonde, has stolen some money from a customer’s purse. He has the victim sitting next to him, he says, and also surveillance footage of the crime. Sandra, a good-natured sort but eager to stay in control, then does what he instructs her to do—confronts the baffled Becky in a back room, searches her things, and, finally, strip-searches her. (The cop says it’s easier than hauling Becky down to the station and booking her.) The customers come and go, the fries sizzle in fat, the bacon runs out. Sandra, as she deals with the police, keeps the restaurant working, while the other employees, fond of Becky but hapless, take part in her detention and humiliation, doing what the man on the phone orders. Zobel works close to his characters, catching them at moments of doubt before they press ahead. The actors, inspired by the attempt to do something daring, display a perfect balance of casualness and intensity. For this fable to work at all, you have to believe everything in it, and experience the girl’s plight as a genuine violation. I didn’t detect a false note: the rhythm of the movie is workaday and unforced, the restaurant details so oddly right that you feel sure you understand everyone who works there.

Rating : 3 / 5 - courtesy : newyorker.com

Movie Review Sparkle 2012 English


"Sparkle" is a full-bodied musical melodrama that acquires a melancholy undertone because it features the last performance by Whitney Houston. She exhibits a serene middle-age beauty here, and there are no hints that she would die shortly after the film was finished. But the script gives her one chilling line, which she uses in a lecture to her three daughters: "Was my life not enough of a cautionary tale for you?"

She plays Emma, a conservative Detroit middle-class church lady, whose apparent prosperity is hard to explain in light of her daughter's memories of finding her passed out in her own vomit. The family lives in a comfy home where all three grown-up girls are relentlessly ruled by Emma's curfews, her compulsory church attendance, and her stern warnings to any man who drifts too near her treasures.

The most fragrant flower in the bouquet is slinky, sexy Sister (Carmen Ejogo). The most serious is college student Dee (Tika Sumpter), apparently the first woman they've ever seen who wears an Afro. The shy sweetheart is Sparkle, played by the perfectly named American Idol winner Jordin Sparks. She lives and breathes music and fills notebooks with her songs but doesn't have the courage to face the spotlight; as the movie opens she's backstage urging Sister to solo, which Sister, after a show of reluctance, does -- sensationally. Carmen Ejogo, who you may recall as Thomas Jefferson's lover in the TV series "Sally Hemmings," steals the film not only in her sultry singing numbers but in her violent marriage to a snaky, evil comedian named Satin (Mike Epps).

That comes after the three girls have taken the first steps in a musical career masterminded by a nice guy named Stix (Derek Luke), who meets Sparkle at church, falls in love, and produces their first shows. We are meant to believe these early steps in their career were made possible when they sneaked out of their bedroom windows at night; apparently Emma had no hint of their subterfuge.

The screenplay by Mara Brock Akil, inspired by Joel Schumacher's original for the (lesser) 1976 movie "Sparkle," follows well-worn showbiz patterns as the girls go from rags to riches to tragedy to comeback. The most electrifying scenes involve the destructive comedian Satin, a local celebrity, who finds Sister in love with the sincere young man Levi (Omari Hardwick), humiliates him, sweeps her up, gives her a diamond and in what seems like days is knocking her around and has her addicted to cocaine. His role model could be Ike Turner.

I won't say more about Satin, except that the character inspires a prison sentence that is treated by the film with curious superficiality. But never mind. The basic purpose of the film is to fit the story into wall-to-wall music, and it does that with style and energy. "Sister and Her Sisters," the original trio, come across as a gifted American Idol version of Diana Ross and the Supremes, which I think is the idea. And Sparkle as a solo act (with backup singers, a gospel choir and a full pit orchestra) brings down the house.

Whitney Houston has a solo showcase in a church scene, singing "His Eye is on the Sparrow," and if her voice doesn't match her glory days her presence certainly does. Director Salim Akil and musical consultant R. Kelly don't let her, or any of the singers, down. "Sparkle" isn't blindingly original but it delivers solid entertainment, and despite the clichés I was never for a moment bored. I do feel, however, that it might have been a kindness to leave out the dialog about Houston's character waking in her own vomit. How did that make her feel while she was filming the scene. How does it make us feel now?

Rating : 4/5 - courtesy : http://www.rogerebert.com


Movie Review Challenge Kannada 2012


Seven persons inhaling the Pentene gas go unconscious. When gain consciousness they are suffering from short term memory loss.

Why Achuyth Kumar, Dilipraj, Harish Raj, Sanjana Singh, Nishanth. Kalabhavan Mani plus wounded Riyaz Khan are located in the old factory go down? That is interesting part of the film. After they get conscious they are not able to identify each other because of short time memory loss. The attempts to get out of the factory is not possible as it is locked from outside. There is no other way.

In the second half via Kalabhavan Mani the flash back opens. It is a drug mafia connected story line. The king pin in the drug mafia case assemble all these at one place because Riyaz Khan a cop has got the clue. The supply of drugs in the food packed is done in the hotel of Harish Raj and his wife Sanjana Singh. The two doing this job for the sake of money are Achyuth Kumar and Dilip Raj.

Nishanth is the son in law of drug mafia lord and drug packaging in his old factory is not known to him. This is how all the seven are connected.

The outside operator is Dharma a cop. He is in connivance with Kalabhavan Mani supervising the smooth drug racket.

The flash back clears all the doubts in the minds. At this time all the six now – Riyaz Khan a cop is dead from bullet hit – gain their memory. Thus the drug lord enters the scene. It is Achyuth Kumar who takes the final course of action. Three are killed in this – drug lord, Dharma and Kalabhavan Mani – all connected to drug mafia. Why Achyuth Kumar taken this drastic step is what you have to know in the theatres.

The first half of the film is a big question mark in the minds of the audience. Second half is loaded with answers.

The six characters in the film struggling to know who they are ‘Yaaru Naanu’ – was a subject of one of the experiment Kannada cinema ‘Yaaru Nanu’ directed by Bheemeshwara Rao Mujaluru played by Manu of yesteryears.

After a hit to the head the protagonist Manu questions ‘Yaaru Naanu’. When he meets with another accident he  regains his memory.

In ‘Chellenge’ it is short term memory loss from inhaling the Pentene gas!

Ganesh Kamaraj in his debut film (it is done in Tamil and Malayalam) has shown high degree of skill. He is intelligent. He knows how to make it captivating in ‘Challenge’. The major flaw in him is the second half that strains the nerves.

For the film audience come to take entertainment but not to write examination is what Ganesh Kamaraj should know. He overflows with intriguing moments in the second half. He should have divided the film precisely.

All those who come from training institutes have this problem of Ganesh Kamarajan. They go bookish. They do not think on the lines of how audience feels.

In answering his questions of the first half Ganesh Kamaraj gets full marks. It is only in releasing the load he fails to give relief.

Coming to the contents Ganesh Kamaraj has taken up urge to become rich over night is the main focus. What costly mistake from such decisions in life, the answer is given convincingly by Achyuth Kumar character.

The friendship is another factor the film focus is well defined. The sacrifice point the friends reach in the second half is admirable.

This is absolutely the career best performance of Achyuth Kumar. He is the real hero of the film. The different shades his role carries – his ability to fulfill all has come out well. Achyuth Kumar should get an award for apt performance.

Harish Raj, Dilip Raj, Kalabhavan Mani, Nishan add to the value of the film. Riyaz Khan and Sanjana Singh have nothing much to do.

The cinematography deserved to be high class for this kind of film. The darkness is more and it is not crystal clear to the eyes. Kannan title song is not appealing but ‘dhaba’ song is OK. There is no lapse in the editing as the main important factor of continuity is not missing. At some places dialogue writer Shaan shines.

‘CHALLENGE’ IS CAPTIVATING! – Score -3.5/5
Cast – Achyuth Kumar, Dilipraj, Harish Raj, Kalabhavan Mani, Dharma, Nishanth, Riyaz Khan, Sanjana Singh, Thirtha, Jayaprakash and others.
Cinematography – Magesh K Dev
Music – Kannan
Producer – Sridhar
Direction – Ganesh Kamaraj  

Movie Review Friday Malayalam 2012


Directorial debut of Lijin Jose, which circle around the happening of just one day in the lives of many people living in Alappuzha. A day that reworked the path of their destiny. The movie released under the banner of Innovate Films Concepts, is produced by Sandra Thomas and Thomas Joseph Pattathanam.

Even if we feel some of the scenes could have been executed better, the movie is done justice to its promising previews. The movie is well narrated with minimal loopholes.

The cast has done an impressive work to portray their characters. Fahad Fazil performance can be complimented as outstanding. He is playing the role of a spry auto rickshaw driver and his Konkani accented language is pretty impressive. He overshadows rest of the cast with his acting skills. His character keep throwing surprises, which keeps audience glued to their seats. Nedumudi Venu as usual gives audience the pleasure of seeing his legendary performance. Manu has done good enough job for audience to keep him in mind. Ann Augustine was able to pull of her character well.

Nimisha Menon, Baiju Ezhuppunna, Krishnan Balakrishnan, Dharmajan Bolgatty, Chembil Ashokan, done justice to their roles. Prakash Bare and Asha Sarath left their mark on the viewers.

The story of Friday is so well knitted that plot and the execution remains Numero Uno, even with the amazing performance of the cast members. Director Lijin has done a good work digging deep into the savage and unsettling feelings that imprisons the human in complex emotions of love, passion, deceit and grief. Najeem Koya is the magician who has knitted such a marvellous script, which can go through ten round of scrutiny but still it will come out solid without loop holes. We should also be admiring the nice visual magic created by cinematographer Jomon Thoman. The music and BGM are admirable again, thanks to Roby Abraham and Rex Vijayan respectively. Editing is by Manoj who has pulled it off decently.

'Friday' is going to write new lines in the books of experimental cinema. It has a good light on the life of “now”. It takes us along for a journey of feelings that we see but tend to ignore.
'Friday' will be a good watch for those who love good cinema with content.

Verdict: Don't Miss It

Movie Review Mister Marumakan 2012


Dileep is back with another bang, or that is what one feels as you watch him in his latest film, 'Mr.Marumakan'.Things could have been really great if its makers had made the latter half on a rather lighter tone and had trimmed the length of the film, but it is nice fun even in its current form.

Ashok Raj (Dileep) is the son of Rajagopalan Thampy (Nedumudi Venu), whose family is based in Ottappalam. Although Ashok Raj is a lawyer, his interest lies in reviving a defunct drama troupe called Bharatha Kalakshetram, which used to be run by his family.

He is directing a drama titled Dasavatharam for the troupe and is also the lead actor in the play. Ashok Raj even changes his name to Ashok Chakravarthy as he thinks it has much more punch as a name for an artiste. His elder brother Babu Raj (Biju Menon), who runs a company, is now in a financial mess.

Balasubrahmanyam (Bhagyaraj) is a bank officer who has come to initiate legal proceedings against Babu Raj to get him to repay the loan that he had taken to start his venture. As it turns out, Balasubrahmanyam is now estranged from his wife the haughty Raja Mallika (Khushboo) and daughter Raja Lakshmi (Sanusha). Raja Mallika hails from a wealthy family and is the daughter of the even haughtier Raja Kokila (Sheela), the boss of Raja's group of companies. The trio believe that a woman can survive easily, without the help of a man. The entry of Ashok Raj into their lives forces them to revise their opinions. On the parallel, we are shown a romance story between Ashok Raj and Raja Lakshmi.

There is nothing spectacular about the storyline by Sibi-Udayan team here and the sequences often happen in a highly predictable and formulaic way. But from the title card onwards the makers are clear that you don't need to use your brains much to enjoy this one! Well, once you are ready with that mindset, it turns out to be an enjoyable experience from Sandhya Mohan and crew.

Dileep is in full form and though certain lines are lewd and the whole film is a bit loud as well, you will find yourself laughing at some of the comic situations for sure.

He repeats his best antics and punchlines to make some genuinely funny moments in the former half.Dileep's combination scenes with Khusboo stood as highlight for the film.Watch out for Kushboo, She performs with a steam and vigour. As a young aristocratic mother-in-law, she is impressive. She brings out her agony, arrogance and anger well.

Sanusha made her malayalam debut as heroine with Dileep and performed well, even though there is not much scope for histrionics in this role. Her contribution is little else besides looking pretty.Bhagyaraj is alright,but his dubbing feels dull. Sheela is over with over make-up, but performance Ok at some parts.

Baburaj, Suraj Venjarumoodu , Harisree Ashokan has also done a fine job in the comedy department. Suresh Krishna and Biju Menon he has nothing much to offer other than what we have seen in most of their old usual roles. Rest of all done their parts without blurred.

The director has come up with a routine storyline and while the presentation was somewhat decent, the narrative was not as per expectations. P.Sukumar's camera is pretty nice and Suresh Petters is in good form with his compositions and the background scores.

"Anganamare aadi vaa.." being the pick of the lot.Mahesh Narayan's editing is peppy apt to the thread. Editing by Ranjan Abraham was adequate. 'Mr.Marumakan' could have been better for sure, but still it provides some really funny moments. Well, the chances are that you may laugh at some of those corny dialogues and feel embarrassed at the thought that you actually enjoyed them, soon after. But don't worry, that's what the film intends do as well!

On the whole, 'Mr.Marumakan'is a crowd-pleaser that knows exactly who its audience is. For fans of Dileep, this old-fashioned entertainer is a treat and delivers enough entertainment for your buck.

Verdict: Time Pass Entertainer.

Review Gajapokiri 2012 Malayalam


Srinivas’s “Gajapokkiri” is the Malayalam version of the Telugu movie “Julai” with Allu Arjun, Illeana D’cruz and Rajendraprasad in the main roles. Allu Arjun as Ravi is the gambling crook at loggerheads with Sonu Sood, who as Bittu, is a notorious thief. The two try to outwit each other and in the process gives rise to a sequence of hilarious situations which finally ends in an appropriate manner.

The movie has an astonishing start which is likely to startle the audience and hold their attention for the rest of the period and the tempo is maintained right through to the end. Allu Arjun as the IPL betting man, is highly entertaining and times his wisecracks to perfection. He dances gracefully, dresses elegantly and fights spectacularly, and his strong screen presence adds fillip to the film. Allu Arjun in short, makes the audience laugh and laugh and laugh. Rajendra Prasad as the shivering cop has another brilliant and outrageously funny role and his histrionics are absolutely fabulous. The combination of Allu Arjun and Rajendra Prasad makes it ten out of ten in humour. Illeana D’cruz as Madhu plays perfect foil Allu Arjun and looks attractive and desirable in the dance and romantic scenes. Also joining the entertaining trio are Brahmanandam and MS Narayana.Sonu Sood as Bittu fits the role and Brahmaji contributes his mite.

Music by Devi Sri Prasad has already proved its quality by being on top of the charts. Dialogues by Thrivikraman are impressive while choreography is quite well done. Srinivasan’s direction is good and he has done a good job with screenplay as well. Editing too has been done crisply and sensibly. Probably, second half could have been edited in a better manner. All in all, Trivikraman has done a fantastic job, tackling a revenge story and making it uproariously funny with his punch lines. He is wonderfully supported by the acting team, none being an exception, but Allu Arjun stands out with his majical performance. Rajendra Prasad as the cowardly cop who turns a new leaf, holds sway over the audience with another superbly comic act.

For fun and entertainment, Gajapokkiri is the answer. - rating : 4/5

Movie Review Paranorman 2012 English


ParaNorman dares to play to all audiences. Unraveling with a purposefully imperfect stop-motion technique, the zombie adventure utilizes striking filmmaking styles, sharp wit, and scares that will give young ones the willies while tickling the nostalgia bone of any adult who used to stay up past his or her bedtime watching horror movies. The film isn't overtly for anyone; it's simply on a mission to tell a great story. ParaNorman succeeds: embracing a world where bullying is hitting an epidemic level and the social "outcasts" are lashing out, the animated movie balances emotional messages with a wild visual ride. Quite out of the ordinary — the living dead being just the beginning.

Norman (The Road's Kodi Smit-McPhee) is a middle schooler living on the fringes. He sits alone at lunch with his only real friend, the chubby nerd Neil; he's routinely beat up by schoolyard bully Alvin (Christopher Mintz-Plasse); and the kicker: he sees ghosts — and no one believes him. Norman passes the time by watching old horror movies with the spirit of his Grandma (Elaine Stritch), much to the chagrin of his mother (Leslie Mann) and father (Jeff Garlin). Norman's dad is fed up with Norman's "disturbed" behavior, but before he can ship his son off to psychiatric help, all hell breaks loose in their hometown of Blithe Hollow. Failing to put together the cryptic words of town crazy Mr. Prenderghast and keep zombies at rest, Norman goes on the run from the living dead, who take to the streets of Blithe Hollow. Why? The mystery is revealed as Norman embarks on a Goonies-style race around Blithe Hollow.

ParaNorman only loses footing when it's in explanation mode, setting up the pieces of the puzzle that will play out in the movie's second half (not unlike most movies of the genre it's riffing on). But the introductions to the colorful cast and horror-inspired adventure, brought to life with stunning animation and a muted color palette unlike most kid-friendly cartoons, are an absolute treat. Norman is a three-dimensional character both in puppetry and human terms; Smit-McPhee's timid vocals realize the fear of the scary moments, and work as perfect deadpan to ParaNorman's comedic asides. The movie advances its risk-taking to a whole other level in the finale, offering an explosive crescendo that wows the senses and is sure to bring tears to the eyes. It's a marvel on a technical level — intricate landscapes shot with shallow focus all set to Jon Brion's rousing score — but in the end, the film works because it's a great, bold story. For a movie grounded in fear, ParaNorman stands out as a movie for audiences young and old that's truly fearless.


Release Date: 08/17/2012
Rating:3/5
Runtime: 1 hr 31 mins
Genre: Children's/family
Director: Sam Fell
Cast: Kodi Smit-McPhee, Tucker Albrizzi, Casey Affleck, Anna Kendrick

Movie Review Expendables 2 English



It's rare that a sequel trumps the original, but The Expendables 2 manages to do just that, with a steady stream of one-liners and welcome, weathered faces, as well as a few new ingredients. E2 seems even more self-aware of its own silliness, especially with Jean-Claude Van Damme as the villain (named Vilain, of course), and Chuck Norris and Arnold Schwarzenegger popping up in smaller roles alongside previous Expendables Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Bruce Willis, Terry Crews, and Randy Couture.

Then again, The Expendables wasn't any sort of action classic; it was like writer/director/star Stallone threw a whole bunch of ideas at the wall to see which would stick, then added massive amounts of weapons and the occasional hand-to-hand combat. It was popular, but it definitely not the kind of awesome actioner that the stars were able to make 10 or 20 years ago. There's the rub, actually; like women actors who have written or directed their own projects because nothing else was available or satisfactory, Stallone created The Expendables because Hollywood didn't seem to know what to do with him and his fellow action stars as they got older. It's easy to criticize Stallone et al for not doing the same amount of stunt work or hand-to-hand fighting that, for example, Statham is capable of, but the whole thrust of the movie is that they're expendable -- to themselves, to the world, and, until Stallone kickstarted these movies, to Hollywood.

E2 is still clumsy, but it's a little more adventurous and a little more introspective. Two new additions to the crew seem to throw everyone for a loop in one way or another. Liam Hemsworth shows up as Bill the Kid, a sniper who left the military after a raid in Afghanistan went horribly wrong; his age and hopefulness, not to mention physical prowess, is a foil the Sylvester Stallone's Barney Ross, and one that Barney is well aware of. Nan Yu joins the team as Maggie, who is apparently the only person who can disarm the safe that holds whatever secret thing Church (Willis) has sent them to retrieve. And if the Expendables don't get her back alive, Church will make them pay, because even though Maggie is some sort of multilingual computer genius with a vicious roundhouse, she's a lady. On one hand, perhaps we're supposed to gather that this group of old dogs is learning new tricks by having to deal with a smart, capable woman in their midst; the attempts Gunner (Lundgren) makes to flirt with her are clunky and goofy, and she's obviously way too smart for fall for that claptrap. On the other, when she whips out some instruments of torture, Barney cracks, "What are you going to do, give them a pedicure?" And, of course, her role also devolves into an incredibly stilted and unbelievable romantic interest for Barney. One point for trying, but two points deducted for falling into the romantic interest trap.

At times it's hard to tell whether or not we're laughing with the crew or at them. Plus, because of how jam-packed the cast is, some actors get the short end of the stick. Statham is the most charismatic of the bunch, and he also has the most impressive hand-to-hand fight scenes, but the emphasis in E2 is sheer firepower, so he doesn't get nearly enough screen time. Couture is fairly forgettable while Lundgren plays the lunkiest of lunkheads; the running joke is that he has a chemical engineering degree from MIT and was a Fulbright Scholar, which is supposed to be funny... except it's also true. (We're to assume he's mended his evil ways between the first Expendables and the second.) Is Lundgren agreeably poking fun at himself the same way Schwarzenegger hams it up at every turn? Or does E2 have shades of JCVD, which stars Van Damme was a washed-up action star? Are the emotional moments supposed to fall so hilariously flat on purpose? For some reason, it seems important to tease out which parts of these movies are earnest and which are tongue-in-cheek.

There's a weird melancholy about watching this group of aging action stars that has the same tang as watching someone you love grow older, especially as they try so very hard to fight the ravages of time. If you dig a little deeper, maybe deeper than E2 warrants, you could find a well of sadness below the back-slapping antics. The world has changed, and even though Stallone and his crew have muscles so hard and juicy they could pop out of their skin like grapes, they can't compete with Bill the Kid and Maggie and others like them. They know it, and we know it, and while it's good fun to see old friends or onscreen enemies kill scores of bad guys (led by JCVD sporting a truly horrible fake Baphomet-style neck tattoo), there are better, smarter, more exciting and more interesting action films on the horizon.


Release Date: 08/17/2012
Rating: 3/5
Runtime: 1 hr 43 mins
Genre: Action
Director: Simon West
Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren


Movie Review Expendables 2 English 2012, English Movie Review, Hollywood Movie Review Expendables 2

Friday, August 17, 2012

Review Devudu Chesina Manushulu

When Goddess Lakshmi Devi asks Lord Vishnu to tell a story, he tells her a story of two orphans Raviteja and Ileana who grow up in different countries and eventually meet and fall in love. When they break up with a quarrel, Vishnu tells the same story in a different way. Devudu Chesina Manushulu is a commercial experiment from Puri Jagannadh.

Devudu Chesina Manushulu runs in the same pattern as earlier Puri’s commercial entertainers. Hero is an aimless awara and the villain is a mafia don. They both meet at a point and fight head to head. Puri tried to deal this in a comical fashion, but the script is half baked.

DCM definitely has a novel plot and an interesting premise, but the script is not as good as it should be. First half and second half are the same and convincing enough. That is something we don’t see regularly. However, such subjects need finesse on the script level. Puri Jagannadh had a good line on hands. Somehow he has failed on the execution part.

Comedy works out here and there. Ali takes the cake in this department. The main story is about how the lead pair falls in love. The director didn’t take much care about building the love story. A scene or two is given to them and the rest is wasted on so called entertainment. To cut things short first half is passable and second half is horrible in DCM.

Raviteja was energetic as usual. In most of his movies Raviteja shoulders the script. In this movie he is just another character in the drama. He did well within the limitations. Ileana was alright. She should pile up few kilos to bring on the hot factor.

Prakash Raj was fine in a different character. Brahmanandam was good. Ali was hilarious in few scenes. Kovai Sarala too did well. Subba Raju was okay. Jyothi Rana was spicy.

Cinematography was not up to Shyam K Naidu’s standards. Outdoor shots in Bangkok were of poor quality. Music was peppy. Masses will like it. Background score was just average. Editing could have been better. Puri’s punch was missing in the dialogues.

As a director Puri did an okay job. The writer let him down this time. Films like Devudu Chesina Manushulu needs attention to the detail and convincing screenplay. That was missing and that was a major problem with the film.

Devudu Chesina Manushulu has some good comedy scenes and was targeted to be a mass entertainer. But it missed the target due to poor script.

Devudu Chesina Manushulu Movie Rating: 2.5/5
Banner: Sri Venkateswara Cine Chitra
Cast: Raviteja, Ileana D'Cruz,
Music: Raghu Kunche
Producer: B.V.S.N. Prasad
Story, Screen-Play, Director: Puri Jagannadh

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Movie Review Aatakathi Tamil 2012


Attakathi is yet another movie about love - that oft-repeated subject in Indian cinema. There have been numerous films and there will be many more on this theme, but does Attakathi provide a different take on love or is it the same ‘run of the mill’ boy meets girl stuff?

In the outskirts of Chennai, we see Dinakaran aka Dheena. He is a tutorial student due to repeated failures in clearing English in his Class 12 exams. He has his group of friends named ‘Lovers Boys’ and you guessed it right, their only job is to go on the footboard of buses and try their luck with every other girl they see. While his friends get lucky in love, Dheena is repeatedly snubbed and after awhile he becomes totally averse to love. But, when he meets his first love, Poornima, again the flames are rekindled. Will he get lucky in love for a change this time around? Watch the flick to find out.

The transition of Dheena from a naïve tutorial student to the roguish ‘Route Thala’ of his college is cool. The makeover changes are also noticeable. When he encounters his first love again, the conflicts that he goes through are also well portrayed.

The standout aspect of Attakathi is its light hearted treatment. Most of the scenes make you smile even though the story as such is minuscule. The scenes are also repetitive as there are so many episodes in the bus. That said, the karate episode in the first half stands out for its solid humor.

The hero, Dinesh, has made a good debut but he is a bit conscious given the fact that it is his debut. He seems to be a natural and is a promising find.

The parents of Dheena are a riot with their loud demeanour. All the friends are the typical filmy ones who would go to any lengths to help the hero in matters of love.

It takes awhile for us to realize who the real heroine is, as there are so many girls (Divya, Nadhiya, Amudha) in the first half but finally we realize that Poornima is the one. Nandita, as Poornima, is cute and the typical homely girl next door.

The songs by Santhosh Narayan are on the mark  - be it the rustic Aadi Pona, the gaana Nadukadalula, the peppy Va Routu Thala or the melodic Aasai Or Pulveli. The BGM has the accordion prominently.

The cinematography by P.K.Varma isn’t out of the ordinary as the film’s setting is earthy and realistic. The film goes at a sluggish pace at times due to the repetitive scenes and when the movie gets serious, it stands out oddly.

But just when we feel that the movie is resolving on a familiar path, we get a pleasant shock. Watch out for that.

To conclude, Attakathi will make a mark among the young male populace due to the subject. It is realistic; light hearted and turns out to be quite a ride, with its share of speed bumps.

Verdict: It’s a roller-coaster ride - Rating : 3/5